IRIS Module on RTI
Thoughts (Before completing the model)
1. What procedures do you think Rosa Parks Elementary is using to provide services to struggling students? Why are school personnel dissatisfied with this process?
I think Rosa Parks Elementary is currently using the “wait-to-fail” approach to determine which students are struggling. The “wait-to-fail” approach is when a student needs supportive services, but the student will not receive the services until he or she is failing academically. As a result, the student is frustrated and struggles in school.
In class this past week, we watched a video which explained that the “wait-to-fail” approach is linked to the use of the IQ discrepancy model. Therefore, I also think Rosa Parks Elementary is using the IQ discrepancy model to determine if students need extra services.
The school personnel are dissatisfied with this current process because they want to provide students with needed support before the students fall behind and are failing academically. The personnel members wish to learn about a more effective way to identify and provide support to students. They realize that students in first grade students who struggle with reading do not receive supportive services until third grade, when they have fallen behind and are failing.
2. What approaches are available to schools to help struggling readers and to efficiently identify students who need special education services?
In reflecting on my second grade methods block placement, I know that the school used the RTI model to help struggling students. During the school day, a small group of students left the classroom to receive extra support from a reading specialist and a math specialist. The general education teacher, reading specialist, and math specialist would keep records about each student’s progress. They would often communicate, discussing how much progress has been made and what weaknesses to address.
Additionally, schools may use entrance exams and diagnostic exams to identify students who need special education services. I have volunteered at my hometown’s primary school summer school program. The school required students to take a kindergarten entrance exam. Students who scored low on the exam attend a kindergarten summer program. The summer program provides these students with extra support they need to be successful in school.
Moreover, in connecting back to the movie viewed this past week, schools also use the IQ discrepancy model to determine if students need special education services.
3. What other information might a school find helpful when choosing which approach to adopt?
I believe a school needs to critically examine and discuss all different types of available approaches before adopting one. The school needs to review the current research and collected data about each approach. The school should learn if the approach has been implemented in classrooms. The school should also learn about the effectiveness of the approach. Additionally, the school should learn if the teachers need to receive any special training in order to effectively implement the approach in their instruction. The school needs to also determine if they will need to supply the teachers with additional resources to put the selected approach into practice.
4. What steps might the S-Team propose to help its struggling readers?
I think the S-Team should consider using the RTI model to help struggling readers. The RTI model will be helpful because the students who need extra support will be identified early on, before they progress further in school and are failing. Thus, the “wait-to-fail” situation will be avoided.
I also think the S-Team should reflect on the type of instruction the students are receiving. Are the students receiving high-quality instruction? What can be implemented in the classroom to help the student progress? In order to effectively determine the level of instruction quality, the S-Team should work as a collaborative team in which the members share their related knowledge and experiences. Having regular team meetings would help the members to share their ideas.
Response (after completing the module)
1. What are the disadvantages of the IQ discrepancy model and how does RTI address those concerns? What might be difficult in implementing the RTI model?
The IQ discrepancy model includes many disadvantages. For instance, it is unclear if the student is struggling due to the quality of instruction or due to a disability. The IQ discrepancy model does not use classroom data and may have bias results. As a result, a student may be misidentified and misplaced. Moreover, this model requires students to meet specific criteria to receive special services. Students who need such services, but do not meet all needed requirements, do not receive the services. These students will continue to struggle and may receive special services after they are failing. This is known as the “wait-to-fail” problem.
The RTI model addresses these concerns in many ways. The RTI model examines classroom instruction and implemented interventions, ensuring that the students are receiving high-quality instruction. Therefore, there is a distinction between the disability and quality of instruction. This model uses classroom data; thus, bias results, misidentification, and misplacement of a student are reduced. Additionally, the RTI model immediately provides struggling students with needed support. Therefore, the “wait-to-fail” problem is avoided. I believe the most important advantage of using the RTI model instead of the IQ discrepancy model is that the RTI model provides students with high-quality instruction before they are placed in a special education class.
The RTI model may be difficult for teachers to implement in the classroom. Teachers may struggle to teach and record data at the same time. Additionally, teachers need to communicate with related professionals about effective interventions to include in their practice. Finding time to meet with related professionals may be a logistical struggle. Moreover, the school may lack needed resources required for suggested interventions. The teachers may also have to pursue special training in order to effectively carry out certain interventions. Despite these challenges, I believe teachers need to realize that their primary duty is to teach students in the most effective and appropriate style. All students learn differently; therefore, teachers need to be adaptive and open to learning new ways of instructing.